Indwelling without the indwelling Holy Spirit: a critique of Ray Yeo’s modified account

Authors

  • Kimberley Kroll University of St. Andrews

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.100824101711

Abstract

In 2014, Ray Yeo published a modified account of the Spirit’s indwelling in “Towards a Model of the Indwelling: A Conversation with Jonathan Edwards and William Alston.” Yeo utilizes a conglomerate of Two-Minds Christology and Spirit Christology to provide a metaphysical framework for his model which he believes offers a viable alternative to more traditional merger accounts like those of Edwards and Alston. After providing an overview of Yeo’s objections to the merger accounts of Alston and Edwards, I will summarize Yeo’s modified model. I will argue Yeo’s emphasis on the humanity of Christ in lieu of a literal, internal, and direct union of the Holy Spirit and the human person cannot alleviate the core metaphysical concerns which surface in all accounts of union between the divine and human.  Yeo’s misunderstanding of Two-Minds Christology leads him to deny the full humanity of Christ; a humanity upon which his entire account of the indwelling relies. Yeo’s modified model will be shown unsuccessful as an account of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit even if one accepts both his conception of Two-Minds Christology and his conditions for indwelling.

Author Biography

Kimberley Kroll, University of St. Andrews

PhD candidate,

Logos Institute of Analytic and Exegetical Theology,

St. Mary's School of Divinity, University of St. Andrews

Downloads

Published

2019-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles